Indonesian Industrial Correctional Models in the Perspective of Criminology Welfare
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 03 February 2023

Indonesian Industrial Correctional Models in the Perspective of Criminology Welfare

Andi Wijaya Rivai, Muhammad Mustofa

University of Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.06.01.394

Pages: 69-80

Keywords: Coaching, Convicts, Community Welfare, Industrial Prisons, Organizational Independence

Abstract

The use of industrial prisons is a strategy that is essential to reaching the objective of training prisoners. The goal of the industrial jail program is to better the attitudes and behaviors of prisoners while also preparing them by giving them knowledge and skills. The continued industrial activities will also help achieve the goal of increasing the independence of the prison organizations and having an impact on both the community's and the prisoners' wellbeing. This study aims to shed light on how Indonesian industrial prisons operate, the issues they encounter, and the development of suitable replacement models for industrial jail programs. This study employs a qualitative methodology. The analysis's main tool is a feasibility study with a welfare criminology approach. The administration of industrial prisons is still closely linked to the administration of the bureaucracy, and the incompetence of convicts and the difficulty of financial accountability prevent effective development of industrial operations. Therefore, one step that must be taken for this program to have an influence on public welfare is to construct an acceptable industrial prison model by taking into account current legislation and expert engagement. making it so that industrial activity don't develop enough. Therefore, one step that must be taken for this program to have an influence on public welfare is to construct an acceptable industrial prison model by taking into account current legislation and expert engagement. making it so that industrial activity don't develop enough. Therefore, one step that must be taken for this program to have an influence on public welfare is to construct an acceptable industrial prison model by taking into account current legislation and expert engagement.

References

  1. Day, Andrew, Jo Wodak, Joe Graffam, Eileen Baldry & Linda Davey (2017), Prison Industry and Desistance from Crime: An Australian Program, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,

  2. Fenwick, Colin. (2005). Private Use of Prisoners' Labor: Paradoxes of International Human Rights Law. Human Rights Quarterly, Vol.27. No.1: p.249-293.

  3. Garvey, Stephen R. (1998). Freeing Prisoners' Labor. Stanford Law Review. Vol. 50. No.2: pp.339-398.

  4. Hampton, Jean (1984), The Moral Education Theory of Punishment, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol.13, No.3: pp.208-238.

  5. Hawkins, Gordon (1983). Prison Labor and Prison Industries. Crime and Justice. Vol. 5: pp.85-127.

  6. Masur, Jonathan S. and Eric A. Posner (2010), Against Feasibility Analysis. The University of Chicago Law Review. Vol. 77. No. 2: p.p. 657-716.

  7. Mustofa, Muhammad (2010). Criminology: A Sociological Study of Crime, Deviant Behavior and Law Violations. ed. Second. Bekasi: Sari Ilmu Pratama (SIP).

  8. Raghavan, Vijay. (2011), Guidelines for Public Private Partnership in Prison Management, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.46, No.4, pp.16-19.

  9. Richmond, Kerry M. (2014). The Impact of Federal Prison Industries Employment on the Recidivism Outcomes of Female Inmates, Justice Quarterly, 31:4, 719-745.

  10. Ruggiero, Vincenzo and Tony Goodman (1993). Prison: the Paradox of Prison Employment, Socialist Lawyer. Pluto Journals. No.19: pp.18-19.

  11. Saroso (1964), “The Operations of Correctional Institutions Companies”, presented at the Service Conference of the Corrections Directorate in April/May 1964.

  12. Simon, HA 1959. “Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science.” American Economic Review49:253–83.

  13. Gottschalk, P. (2019). Theory of Convenience: Determinants of White-Collar Crime Intention. Deviant Behavior, 1-9. doi:10.1080/01639625.2019.1624101

  14. Snar, Richard W (1996). Introduction to Corrections, third edition, Madison, Dubuque. IA, Guifford, CT., Chicago, Toronto, London, Caracas, Mexico City, Benos Aires, Madrid, Bogota, Sydney; Brown & Benchmark publishers.

bottom of page