Journal of Social and Political
Sciences
ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)
ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)
Published: 18 January 2024
Online Political Discourse in Cambodia: Does Facebook Serve as a Public Sphere or the Spiral of Silence?
Seyha Chan
The University of Melbourne
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1991.07.01.463
Pages: 25-37
Keywords: Political Opinion Expression, Online Political Participation, Political Self-Disclosure, Social Media, The Spiral of Silence
Abstract
With the emergence of web-as-participation platforms, social media such as Facebook allows users to discuss public opinion for political and social changes in both small groups and the public sphere. To understand whether Facebook is a free without-fear public sphere, this study aimed to investigate the attitudes and behaviours of Facebook users toward political opinion expression on the political Facebook platform called Politikoffee. To address this research gap, this study focused on Cambodian Politikoffee participants aged between 18 and 33, who are considered active tech-savvy and public activists. The data were collected through digital ethnography on the Politikoffee Facebook platforms and in-depth semi-structured interviews with 8 respondents. To gain comprehensive insights into the attitudes and behaviours of Facebook users toward political opinion expression, the results were analysed in conjunction with the ‘Spiral of Silence Theory’. The spiral of silence theory suggests that users tend to express their genuine ideas when they feel the majority supports their opinion. In contrast, they might remain silent if they realise only a small social group upholds their idea because they fear social isolation. In examining whether Facebook serves as a free and fear-free public sphere, the study discovered that Facebook users were concerned about online political discourse due to socio-psychological factors, including 1) the restriction of freedom of expression, 2) the fear of political arrest, 3) the prevalence of political nepotism, 4) worries about digital surveillance, 5) concerns about digital footprint, 6) political knowledge deficiency, and 7) the traumatising effects of civil war, which can trigger their self-censorship.
References
Association for Progressive Communications. (2017). Unshackling expression: A study on laws criminalising expression online in Asia. https://www.giswatch.org/sites/default/files/giswspecial2017_web.pdf
Chunly, S. (2019). Facebook and political participation in Cambodia: Determinants and impact of online political behaviours in an authoritarian state. South East Asia Research, 27(4), 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2019.1692635
Datareportal. (2023). Digital 2023: Cambodia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-cambodia
Diamond, L. (2010). Liberation technology. Journal of Democracy, 21(3), 68—83.
Din, D. (2020). Cambodian identity, culture, and legacy. In Deth, S. U., Murg, B. J., Ou, V. & Renfrew, M. (Eds), Cambodian 2040: Culture and society. Future Forum and Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Doyle, K. J. (2021). Co-opted social media and the practice of active silence in Cambodia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 43(2), 293-320. DOI: 10.1355/cs43-2
Duncan, M., Pelled, A., Wise, D., Ghosh, S., Shan, Y., Zheng, M., & McLeod, D. (2020). Staying silent and speaking out in online comment sections: The influence of spiral of silence and corrective action in reaction to news. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.026
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
Eng, N., & Hughes, C. (2017). Coming of age in peace, prosperity, and connectivity: Cambodia’s young electorate and its impact on the ruling party’s political strategies. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341185
Freedom House. (2021). Freedom in the world 2021. https://freedomhouse.org/country/cambodia/freedom-world/2021
Freedom House. (2022). Freedom on the net 2022: Cambodia. https://freedomhouse.org/country/cambodia/freedom-net/2022
Geiger, N., & Swim, J. K. (2016). Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.002
Georgakopoulou, A., & Spilioti, T. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. Routledge.
Gil De Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press.
Hampton, K. N., Rainie, L., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014). Social media and the ‘spiral of silence’. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence/
Kopp, C., Green, D., & Seeme, F. (2019). Pluralistic ignorance: a trade-off between group conformity and cognitive dissonance. In M. Lee, T. Gedeon & K. W. Wong (Eds.), Neural information processing: 26th informational conference, ICONIP 2019, Sydney, NSW, Australia, December 12-15, 2019 proceeding, part II (pp. 665-705). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social media as a public sphere? politics on social media. The Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143
Liu, Y., Rui, J. R., & Cui, X. (2017). Are people willing to share their political opinions on Facebook? Exploring roles of self-presentational concern in spiral of silence. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.029
Masten, D. L., & Plowman, T. M. P. (2003). Digital ethnography: The next wave in understanding the consumer experience. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 14(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2003.tb00044.x
Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology. 53(1), 298-305.
Morris, D. S., & Morris, J. S. (2013). Digital inequality and participation in the political process: Real or imagined? Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313489259
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
Vong, M., & Hok, K. (2018). Facebooking: Youth’s everyday politics in Cambodia. South East Asia Research, 26(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X17754113
Vorn, M. & Ly, Y. (2020). Promoting better governance through Facebook: A pilot study and analysis. https://www.kas.de/en/web/kambodscha/single-title/-/content/promoting-better-governance-through-facebook-a-pilot-study-and-analysis
Young, S. (2021). Internet, Facebook, competing political narratives, and political control in Cambodia. Media Asia, 48(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2021.1881285