top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 25 August 2024

People’s Political Participation: A Theoretical Exposition and Reality in Case of Bangladesh

Bibi Morium

University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.07.03.505

Pages: 75-89

Keywords: Bangladesh, People’s Participation, Political Participation, Theory, Reality

Abstract

People’s participation is one of the central things in a parliamentary democracy. An effective democracy cannot be imagine without people’s participation. In this respect, this research investigated the people’s political participation in Bangladesh. For that the theories or models related to people’s political participation are reviewed first. Then people’s political participation in Bangladesh is analysed to see whether any theory or model best fit to explain it or not. The empirical analysis and findings are based on primary data collected using a field survey conducted in February-April 2018 using a structured questionnaire in the Rajshahi City Corporation area. In the case of theories related to people’s participation, five models were found in the literature. They are the Civic Voluntarism Model (CVM), the Rational Expectation Model (REM), the Social Psychological Model (SPM), the Mobilization Model (MM), and the General Incentive Model (GIM). It is found that each of the models has some strengths as well as weaknesses to explain people’s participation. On the basis of the framework we get from different models it is found that the Civic Voluntarism Model to some extent explains the people’s participation in Bangladesh. This research provides an explanation of people’s political participation in general as well as in Bangladesh.

References

  1. Back, H., Teorell, J. & Westholm, A. (2011) ‘Explaining modes of participation: a dynamic test of alternatives rational choice models’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 34, (1) pp. 74-97

  2. Blair, H. (2000) ‘Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries’, World Development, 28, (1) pp. 21-39.

  3. Chowdhury, D. (1995) Constitutional Development in Bangladesh: Stresses and Strains Dhaka: The University Press Ltd.

  4. Cox, G. W. & Munger, M. C. (1989) ‘Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 U.S. house elections’, American Political Science Review, 83 (1), pp. 217-231

  5. Down, A. (1957) ‘An economic theory of political action in a democracy’, Journal of Political Economy, 65, (2) pp. 135-150

  6. Goel, M. L. (1980) Conventional Political Participation. In: Smith, D. H. and Maculay, J., eds. Participation in Social and Political Activities: A Comprehensive Analysis of Political Involvement, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 108-132

  7. Huntington, S. P. (1979) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  8. Jahan, R. (1980) Bangladesh Politics: Problems and Issues. Dhaka: University Press, Ltd.

  9. Leighley, J. E. (1995) ‘Attitudes, opportunities and incentives: a field essay on political participation’, Political Research Quarterly, 48, (1) pp. 181-209

  10. Leighley, J. E. & Vedlitz, A. (1999) ‘Race, ethnicity, and political participation: competing models and contrasting explanations’, The Journal of Politics, 61, (4) pp. 1092-1114

  11. Milbrath, L. W. (1965) Political Participation, How and Why do People get Involved in Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.

  12. Muller, E. N, Dietz, H. A. & Finkel, S.E (1991) ‘Discontent and the expected utility of rebellion: the case of Peru’, The American Political Science Review, 85, (4) pp. 1261-1282

  13. Oppenheimer, J. A. (2008) Rational Choice Theory. Draft for Sage Encyclopedia of Political Theory, [Online] Available at: <http://www.gvptsites.umd.edu/ oppenheimer/ research/rct.pdf> [Accessed on 21/04/16]

  14. Opp, K. (2011) ‘Why do people vote? The cognitive-illusion proposition and its test’, Kyklos, 54, pp. 255-378

  15. Rosenstone, S. J. & Hansen, J. M. (1993) Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

  16. Rubenson, D. (2000) Participation and Politics: Social Capital, Civic Voluntarism, and Institutional Context, Paper prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, University of Copenhagen. [Online] Available at: <https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/00cdee63-6d2e-478e-91a6-4d6de3a01a2b.pdf> [Accessed on 05/06/2016]

  17. Sarowardy, M. H. (2000) People’s Participation in Bangladesh Politics: A Study of June 1996 Parliamentary Election. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Political Science, Rajshahi University.

  18. Tullock, G. (1971) ‘The paradox of revolution’, Public Choice, 11, pp. 89-99

  19. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. & Brady, H. E. (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, USA: Harvard University Press

  20. Waheduzzaman (2010a) Peoples Participation for Good Governance: A Study of Rural Development Programs in Bangladesh. Unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University, Australia.

  21. Waheduzzaman (2010b) ‘Value of People’s Participation for Good Governance in Developing Countries’, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4, (4) pp. 386-402.

  22. Whiteley, P. F. (1995) ‘Rational choice and political participation – evaluating the debate’, Political Research Quarterly, 48, (1) pp. 211-233

  23. Wielhouwer, P. W. & Lockerbie, B. (1994) ‘Party contacting and political participation, 1952-90’, American Journal of Political Science, 38, (1), pp. 211-229.

bottom of page