top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political


ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
open access

Published: 24 May 2019

Perceived Threat Had a Greater Impact Than Contact with Immigrants on Brexit Vote

Julian R.P. Bond, Ricardo Tejeiro

The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom), Laureate Online Education (Netherlands)

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 333-346

Keywords: Intergroup Threat, Contact Theory, Prejudice, Brexit, Immigration, Voting Behaviour


In the early 21st century, the United Kingdom (UK) witnessed a significant rise in net immigration, partly caused by freedom of movement within the European Union (EU). In response to political pressures, a referendum on EU membership was held in June 2016, resulting in a narrow majority for leaving the EU. This paper analyses the relative impact of contact and perceived threat on prejudice and voting behaviour in the referendum based on a sample of 1127 UK adults. While racial prejudice was a significant predictor of stated voting behaviour in the referendum, the relationship of voting with perceived threat was greater. Both factors were around five times more predictive of voting behaviour than contact. Both prejudice towards and perceived threat from EU immigrants was significantly more predictive than the same measures across all immigrants, suggesting that the impact of these variables on voting behaviour was more nuanced than a general negativity towards immigrants. There was no evidence that any positive effect of contact in reducing prejudice cumulates over multiple touchpoints.


  1. Abrams, D., & Travaglino, G. A. (2018).  Immigration, political trust, and Brexit – Testing an aversion amplification hypothesis.  British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 310–326.

  2. Allport, G.W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice.  Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

  3. Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R., Harwood, J., ... & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1629-1643.

  4. Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., ... & Leyens, J. P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843 - 856.

  5. Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai-Bell, N. (2001). Perceived threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 253 - 267.

  6. Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255-343.

  7. Bullock III, C. S. (1978). Contact theory and racial tolerance among high school students. The School Review, 86(2), 187-216.

  8. Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to" prejudice". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770 - 789.

  9. Dyck, J. J., & Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2014). To know you is not necessarily to love you: The partisan mediators of intergroup contact. Political Behavior, 36(3), 553-580.

  10. Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2017). Brexit and prejudice against immigrants: the UK is not unique.  Under Submission, Retrieved June 27, 2018 from

  11. Forster, K (2016, October 13). Hate crimes soared by 41% after Brexit vote, official figures reveal. The Independent.  Retrieved 3 March 2017.

  12. Fossett, M. A., & Kiecolt, K. J. (1989). The relative size of minority populations and white racial attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 70(4), 820 - 835.

  13. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1-26.

  14. Hall, M. (2016, June 14). Proof we CAN’T stop migrants: 5 million new EU citizens given right to enter Britain.  The Express. Retrieved March 28, 2017 from

  15. Hammersley M. & Woods P. (1993). Gender and Ethnicity in Schools: Ethnographic Accounts.  Abingdon UK: Routledge.

  16. Heinze, J. E., & Horn, S. S. (2009). Intergroup contact and beliefs about homosexuality in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(7), 937-951.

  17. Janmaat, J. G. (2014). Do ethnically mixed classrooms promote inclusive attitudes towards immigrants everywhere? A study among native adolescents in 14 countries. European Sociological Review, 30(6) 810 – 822.

  18. Kagarlitsky, B. (2017). Brexit and the Future of the Left. Globalizations, 14(1), 110-117.

  19. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.

  20. Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31 – 36.

  21. Khaleeli, H. (2016, June 29). ‘A frenzy of hatred’: How to understand Brexit racism.  The Guardian. Retrieved February 15, 2017 from

  22. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251.

  23. Kittles, R. A., & Weiss, K. M. (2003). Race, ancestry, and genes: implications for defining disease risk. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 4(1), 33-67.

  24. Koch, I. (2017). What's in a vote? Brexit beyond culture wars. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 225-230.

  25. Lee, I. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2013) Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. Retrieved from

  26. Maher, A. A., Aljafari, A. M., & Maher, A. (2017). The Perceived Threats from Migrants and their Effects on Government Service Equality. Journal of Global Marketing, 1-17.

  27. Mansfield, K (2016, December 12). One in six Germans want to leave the EU, new survey finds.  The Express.  Retrieved June 28, 2017 from

  28. McLaren, L. M. (2003). Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces, 81(3), 909-936.

  29. McClendon, M. J. (1974). Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice. Sociological Focus, 7(4), 47-65.

  30. Meleady, R., Seger, C., & Vermue, M. (2017). Examining the role of positive and negative intergroup contact and anti-immigrant prejudice in Brexit. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(4), 799-808.

  31. Montagu, M. A. (1941). The concept of race in the human species in the light of genetics. Journal of Heredity, 32(8), 243-248.

  32. Morris, D. C. (1973). Racial attitudes of White residents in integrated and segregated neighborhoods. Sociological Focus, 6(2), 74-94.

  33. Office for National Statistics (2017).  Migration statistics quarterly report: Feb 2017.  Retrieved March 28, 2017 from

  34. Pettigrew, T. F. (1967). Social evaluation theory: convergences and applications. In D. Levine (ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 15. Lincoln, Nebraska, University of Nebraska Press.

  35. Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 173-185.

  36. Pettigrew, T. F., & Hewstone, M. (2017). The Single Factor Fallacy: Implications of Missing Critical Variables from an Analysis of Intergroup Contact Theory. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 8-37.

  37. Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 57-75.

  38. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(5), 751 - 783.

  39. Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 336-353.

  40. Schlueter, E., & Scheepers, P. (2010). The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat-and intergroup contact theory. Social Science Research, 39(2), 285-295.

  41. Schofield, J. W. (1979). The impact of positively structured contact on intergroup behavior: Does it last under adverse conditions? Social Psychology Quarterly, 42(3), 280-284.

  42. Schwartz, L.K., & Simmons, J.P. (2001). Contact quality and attitudes toward the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 27(2), 127-137.

  43. Sherif, M. (1975). On the application of superordinate goals theory. Social Science Quarterly, 56(3), 510-512.

  44. Shimoni, M. T. K., & Schwarzwald, J. (2003). Perceived threat and prejudice in three domains of inter-group tension in Israeli society. Megamot, 42(4), 549-584.

  45. Slininger, D., Sherrill, C., & Jankowski, C. M. (2000). Children’s attitudes toward peers with severe disabilities: Revisiting contact theory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17(2), 176-196.

  46. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.

  47. Stephan, W. G., & Mealy, M. D. (2011). Intergroup threat theory. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology (pp. 561-565). Hoboken, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

  48. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1996). Predicting prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(3-4), 409-426.

  49. Stephan, W.G. & Stephan, C. W. (2000).  An integrated theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp,  (Ed.) Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination.  Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  50. Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., Martnez, C. M., Schwarzwald, J., & Tur-Kaspa, M. (1998). Prejudice toward immigrants to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(4), 559-576.

  51. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96-102.

  52. Tajfel, H. (2010). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  53. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterrey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

  54. Van de Vyver, J., Leite, A.C., Abrams, D., & Palmer, S.B. (2018). Brexit or Bremain? A personal and social analysis of voting decisions in the EU referendum.  Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 65-79.

  55. Vasilopoulou, S. (2016). UK Euroscepticism and the Brexit Referendum. The Political Quarterly, 87(2), 219-227.

  56. Velasco González, K., Verkuyten, M., Weesie, J., & Poppe, E. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 667-685.

  57. Virdee, S., & McGeever, B. (2018).  Racism, Crisis, Brexit.  Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41 (10), 1802-1819.

  58. Wagner, U., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T. F., Stellmacher, J., & Wolf, C. (2006). Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(4), 380-390.

  59. Wood, P. B., & Sonleitner, N. (1996). The effect of childhood interracial contact on adult antiblack prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(1), 1-17.

  60. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2p2), 1 – 27.

bottom of page