top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 04 July 2024

Public-Private Partnership Model of Correctional Institution: A Comparison Study in Various Countries

Sani Siti Aisyah, Adrianus Eliasta Meliala, Iqrak Sulhin

University of Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.07.03.499

Pages: 1-13

Keywords: Correctional Institution, PPP Models, Privatization, Hybrid

Abstract

This study highlights that Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in correctional institution is not only represented by privatization or private, but is represented by various patterns of private involvement in correctional institution PPP models. Through an exploratory approach in the literature, this study identifies four correctional institution PPP models based on the experience of various countries, namely the "privatization" model, the "hybrid management" model, the "service infrastructure" model, and the "contracting out certain limited functions" model. The characteristics of the four correctional institution PPP models are identified through their similarities and differences based on the scope of private involvement in correctional institution construction and operation. Only the "privatization" model allows private involvement in all aspects of correctional institution development and operation, while the other three PPP models allow private involvement in certain aspects while still positioning the government to control management and custody aspects. The emergence of the three correctional institution PPP models other than "privatization" is the result of the adaptation of the consideration and/or application of the "privatization" prison PPP model.

References

  1. Allen, Rob., & English, Paul. (2013). Public-Private Partnerships in Prison Construction and Management. Justice & Development Working Paper No. 83347. Legal Vice Presidency, The World Bank

  2. Bergere, Francois. (2016). Ten years of PPP: An initial assessment. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2015(1)

  3. Buitenhuis, Amy Johanna. (2013). Public-Private Partnerships and Prison Expansion in Ontario: Shifts in Governance 1995 to 2012. Thesis. Department of Geography and Program in Planning University of Toronto

  4. Byrne, James., Kras, Kimberly R., & Marmolejo, Lina Maria. (2019). International perspective on the privatization of corrections. Criminology & Public Policy, 1-27.

  5. Cabral, Sandro. & Saussier, Stephane. (2013). Organizing Prisons through Public-Private Partnerships: a Cross-Country Investigation. Brazilian Administration Review, 10(1): 100-120

  6. Daems, Tom., & Vander Beken, Tom. (2018). Privatising punishment in Europe: An agenda for research and policy. In Daems, Tom., & Vander Beken, Tom. (Eds). Privatising punishment in Europe?(pp. 1-17). New York: Routledge

  7. Dixon, T., Pottinger, G., & Jordan, A. (2005). Lesson from the private finance initiative in the UK-Benefits, problems and critical success factors. Journal Property Investment Finance, 23(5): 412-423

  8. English, Linda., & Baxter, Jane. (2010). The Changing Nature of Contracting and Trust in Public-Private Partnerships: The Case of Victorian PPP Prisons. A Journal of Accounting, Finance, and Business Studies (ABACUS), 46 (3): 289-319

  9. Gilroy, Leonard., Summers, Adam B., Randazzo, Anthony. & Kenny, Harris. (2010). Public-Private Partnerships for Corrections in California: Bridging The Gap Between Crisis and Reform. Policy Brief of Policy Study No. 381. California: Reason Foundation and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation

  10. Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. (2004). Public private partnerships: The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Edward Elgar Publishing

  11. Grimwood, Gabrielle Garton. (2014). Prisons: The role of the private sector. London: House of Commons Library

  12. Harding, Richard W., Rynne, John. & Thomsen, Lisa. (2019). History of privatized corrections. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(2), 241-268

  13. Hodge, Graeme., & Greve, Carsten. (2017). On Public-Private Partnership: A Contemporary Review. Public Works Management & Policy, 22(1): 55-78

  14. Jing, Yijia. (2010). Prison Privatization: A Study of Causes and Magnitude. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

  15. Kim, Dae-Young. (2022). Prison Privatization: An Empirical Literature Review and Path Forward. International Criminal Justice Review, 32(1): 24-47

  16. Leighton, Paul. (2014). “A model prison for the next 50 years”: The high-tech, public-private Shimane Asahi Rehabilitation Center. Justice Policy Journal, 11(1)

  17. Liebling, Alison. & Ludlow, Amy. (2017). Privatising public prisons: Penality, law and practice.new Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 50(4): 473-492

  18. Liu, Tingting. & Wilkinson, Suzanne. (2014). Critical Factors Affecting the Viability of Using Public-Private Partnerships for Prison Development. American Society of Civil Engineers

  19. Macaulay, Fiona. (2013). Modes of prison administration, control and governmentality in Latin America: adoption, adaptation and hybridity. Conflict, Security & Development, 13(4): 361-392.

  20. National Audit Office (NAO). (2003). The operational performance of PFI prisons. London, U.K.

  21. Newburn, Tim. (2010). Diffusion, differentiation and resistance in comparative penality. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 10(4): 341-352

  22. O’Neill, Deirdre., Sands, Valarie., & Hodge, Graeme. (2020). P3s and Social Infrastructure: Three Decades of Prison Reform in Victoria, Australia. Public Works Management and Policy, 25(3), 214-230

  23. Penal Reform International. (2015). Global Prison Trends 2015. London: Penal Reform International

  24. Reynaers, Anne-Marie. & Paanakker, Hester. (2016). To Privatize or Not? Addressing Public Values in a Semiprivatized Prison System, International Journal of Public Administration, 39(1): 6-14.

  25. Schneider, Anne Larason. (1999). Public-Private Partnerships in the U.S. Prison System. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1): 192-208

  26. Stephenson, Arielle M. (2020). Private Prison Management Needs Reform: Shift Private Prisons to A True Public-Private Partnership. Public Contract Law Journal, 49(3): 477-499

  27. Sands, Valarie., O’Neill, Deidre., & Hodge, Graeme. (2019). Cheaper, better, and more accountable? Twenty-five years of prisons privatisation in Victoria. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 78: 577-595

  28. Van Herck, Els. (2016). Public-Private Partnership. Europris Real Estate and Logistics Expert Group

  29. Wacquant, Loic. (2009). Prisons of Poverty. University of Minnesota Press.

  30. Yescombe, E.R., & Farquharson, Edward. (2018). Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure: Priciples of Policy and Finance (Second Edition). Elesevier Ltd.

  31. Zedner, Lucia. (2018). What is lost when punishment is privatized? In Daems, Tom., & Vander Beken, Tom. (Eds). Privatising punishment in Europe? (pp. 1-17). New York: Routledge

bottom of page