The Comparison of Guerilla Warfare Framework of Mao Tse-Tung, Vo Nguyen Giap, and Che Guevara
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 28 December 2020

The Comparison of Guerilla Warfare Framework of Mao Tse-Tung, Vo Nguyen Giap, and Che Guevara

Tjandra Aribowo, Helda Risman

Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.03.04.239

Pages: 1082-1091

Keywords: Guerilla, Framework, Mao Tse-Tung, Vo Nguyen Giap, Che Guevara

Abstract

Small war became popularly used in irregular warfare when a more considerable force dominated the opponent. Small wars but troublesome opposing forces are known as guerrillas. Since war architects popularized the guerrilla theory, it has also been frequently used in wars between forces. The psychological impact of most of the war's success can influence both state and group leaders to apply this model. It has been practiced and applied for a long time in various parts of the world until today. The very popularity of this model of warfare has prompted the author to produce an article that aims to compare the three guerrilla architects' frameworks from the point of view of a comprehensive strategy, tactics, and social aspects using the method of collecting data through document study. The results show that the framework of Mao Tse Tung, Vo Nguyen Giap, and Che Guevara about guerrilla warfare has its characteristics and perspectives.

References

  1. An, T. S. (1980). Old soldier Giap in his twilight years. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2(3 (December 1980)), 241–249. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25797624

  2. Atkinson, A. (1974). Social War—The Death of Classicalism in Contemporary Strategic Thought? RUSI Journal, 119(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847409421168

  3. Čajić, J. (2016). Relevance of Clausewitz's Theory of War to Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Connections, 15(1), 72–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26326430

  4. Cheng, V. S. C. (2005). Imagining China's Madrid in Manchuria: The communist military strategy at the onset of the Chinese civil war, 1945-1946. Modern China, 31(1), 72–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700404270549

  5. Childs, M. D. (1995). A Historical Critique of the Emergence and Evolution of Ernesto Che Guevara's Foco Theory. Journal of Latin American Studies, 27(3), 593–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00011627

  6. Clausewitz, C. Von. (1989). On war. In M. H. & P. Paret (Ed.), Princeton University Press (1989th ed.). Princenton University Press. http://books.google.com/books?id=-xsoV5ET9J8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:EDMUND+HUSSERL+intitle:THE+CONFRONTATION+WITH+HEIDEGGER&cd=1&source=gbs_api

  7. Dennen, B. J. & J. M. G. van der. (1988). The great "war figures" hoax: an investigation in polemomythology. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 19,2(1899), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/096701068801900208

  8. Dimovski, V., Marič, M., Uhan, M., Đurica, N., & Ferjan, M. (2012). Sun Tzu's "The Art of War" and Implications for Leadership: Theoretical Discussion. Organizacija, 45(4), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-012-0017-1

  9. Edward L. Katzenbach, J., and G. Z. H. (1955). The revolutionary strategy of Mao Tse Tung. Political Science Quarterly, 70(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/2145469

  10. Forgács, B. (2019). Mao and Giap on Partisan Warfare. Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public, 18(2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.32565/aarms.2019.2.3

  11. Fuller, F. F. (2014). Mao tse-tung: military thinker. Military Affairs, 22(3), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/1984695

  12. Ghandhi, R. . K. . S. . (1965). Mao Tse-Tung: His Military Writing and Philosophy. Naval War College Review, 17(7), 1–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44635448

  13. Giap, V. N. (1964). Dien Bien Phu. In Foreign Languages Publishing House. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015V05N01_03

  14. Giles, L. (2012). The Complete Art of War. In Start Publishing LLC.

  15. Grice, F. (2018). The myth of Mao Zedong and modern insurgency. In The Myth of Mao Zedong and Modern Insurgency. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77571-5

  16. Guevara, E. C. (1964). Guerrilla Warfare: A Method. Jurnal Cuba Socialist.

  17. Hughbank, R. J. (2009). Guerilla Warfare & Law Enforcement: Combating the 21st Century Terrorist Cell within the US Journal of Strategic Security, 2(4), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.2.4.4

  18. Kalyanaraman, S. (2003). Conceptualisations of guerrilla warfare. Strategic Analysis, 27(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700160308450082

  19. Kestnbaum, M. (2009). The sociology of war and the military. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120004

  20. Khanh, H. K. I. M. (2015). The Vietnamese Communist Movement Revisited. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), 1976, 445–466.

  21. Lind, W. S. (1989). The changing face of war: into the fourth generation. Globalguerrillas.Typepad.Com. https://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/lind/the-changing-face-of-war-into-the-fourth-generation.html

  22. McCormick, G. H., & Berger, M. T. (2019). Ernesto (Che) Guevara: the last "heroic" guerrilla. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 42(4), 336–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1398319

  23. O'Dowd, E. C. (2013). Ho Chi Minh and the origins of the Vietnamese doctrine of guerrilla tactics. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 24(3), 561–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2013.802606

  24. Park, R. E. (1941). The social function of war observations and notes. American Journal of Sociology, 46(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1086/218698

  25. Petras, J. (1998). Che Guevara and Contemporary Revolutionary Movements. Latin American Perspectives, 25(4), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370902757026

  26. Pribbenow, M. L. (2008). General Võ Nguyên Giáp and the Mysterious Evolution of the Plan for the 1968 Tết Offensive. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 3(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1525/vs.2008.3.2.1

  27. Rich, P. B. (2017). People's war antithesis: Che Guevara and the mythology of Focismo. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 28(3), 451–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2017.1307616

  28. Roese, N. (2000). Comparing comparison: an integrative perspective on social comparison and counterfactual thinking. Handbook of Social Comparison, October 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7

  29. Stanley, G. F. G. (1954). Dien Bien Phu. International Journal, 10(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1300/J015V05N01_03

  30. Tse-Tung, M. (1989). Mao Tse-Tung on guerrilla warfare. In US Marine Corps.

  31. Webb, A. C. (2019). Rethinking Strategy: Art Lykke and the Development of the Ends, Ways, Means Model of Strategy [US Army Command and General Staff College]. https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Webb-Andrew-C.-Rethinking-Strategy-Art-Lykke-and-the-Development-of-the-Ends-Ways-Means-Model-of-Strategy-31-MAY-19.pdf

  32. Yarger, H. R. (2012). Toward a theory of strategy: Art Lykke and the US army war college strategy model. Strategic Studies Institute, I, 45–51. http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep12116.6

bottom of page