top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 01 December 2024

Towards Sustainable E-Commerce: Consumer Preferences for Reducing Packaging Waste in Indonesia—A PLS-SEM Analysis

Muhammad Hang Nadi, Meditya Wasesa

Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.07.04.531

Pages: 123-136

Keywords: E-Commerce Packaging, Overpackaging, Plastic Waste, Environmental Sustainability, PLS-SEM

Abstract

This study examines how Indonesian e-commerce platforms, particularly Tokopedia, can mitigate the environmental impact of overpackaging waste by exploring the effects of sustainable packaging materials, recycling systems, and environmental awareness campaigns on consumer preferences. The research hypothesizes that consumer support for eco-friendly packaging is positively influenced by advancements in packaging design, recycling infrastructure, and environmental education, and highlights the role of government interventions in shaping business and consumer behaviors. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), the study provides insights into sustainable practices within Indonesia’s e-commerce sector, emphasizing value co-creation among consumers, businesses, and policymakers. Findings reveal that consumers highly value optimized packaging, recycling systems with incentives, and eco-conscious brand practices, though incentives and taxes alone are insufficient for driving change. This research offers actionable recommendations for reducing the environmental impact of e-commerce packaging waste and aligns with consumer expectations for sustainability in online shopping.

References

  1. Andariesta, D. T., & Wasesa, M. (2023) Machine Learning Models to Predict the Engagement Level of Twitter Posts: Indonesian E-commerce Case Study. Procedia Computer Science, 227, 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.588

  2. Carlin, C. (2019). Tokyo Pack Introduces Innovative Plastic Packaging Ideas from Asian Exhibitors. Plastics Engineering, 75(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/peng.20052

  3. Chueamuangphan, K., Kashyap, P., & Visvanathan, C. (2020). Packaging Waste from E-Commerce: Consumers’ Awareness and Concern. In Sustainable Waste Management: Policies and Case Studies (pp. 27–41). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7071-7_3

  4. de Almeida Oroski, F., & da Silva, J. M. (2023). Understanding food waste-reducing platforms: A mini-review. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 41(4), 816–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X221135248

  5. Elgaaied-Gambier, L. (2016). Who buys overpackaged grocery products and why? Understanding consumers’ reactions to overpackaging in the food sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(4), 683-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2491-2

  6. Elgaaïed-Gambier, L. (2016). Who Buys Overpackaged Grocery Products and Why? Understanding Consumers’ Reactions to Overpackaging in the Food Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(4), 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2491-2

  7. Elleuch, B., Bouhamed, F., Elloussaief, M., & Jaghbir, M. (2018). Environmental sustainability and pollution prevention. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(19), 18223–18225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0619-5

  8. Escursell, S., Llorach-Massana, P., & Roncero, M. B. (2021). Sustainability in e-commerce packaging: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124314

  9. Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability, 13(3), 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530

  10. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

  11. Foschi, E., & Bonoli, A. (2019). The Commitment of Packaging Industry in the Framework of the European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy. Administrative Sciences, 9(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9010018

  12. Galvagno, M., & Dalli, D. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review. Managing Service Quality, 24(6), 643–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-09-2013-0187

  13. Gaughran, W. F., Burke, S., & Phelan, P. (2007). Intelligent manufacturing and environmental sustainability. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 23(6), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2007.02.016

  14. Gebayew, C., Hardini, I. R., Panjaitan, G. H. A., Kurniawan, N. B., & Suhardi. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review on Digital Transformation. 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITSI.2018.8695912

  15. Grȩbosz-Krawczyk, M., & Siuda, D. (2019). Attitudes of Young European Consumers Toward Recycling Campaigns of Textile Companies. Autex Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2018-0057

  16. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Andersonm, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition) (7th ed.). Pearson.

  17. Hellström, D., & Saghir, M. (2007). Packaging and logistics interactions in retail supply chains. Packaging Technology and Science, 20(3), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.754

  18. Hollaus, M., & Schantl, J. (2022). Incentivizing consumers towards a more sustainable online shopping behavior: A study on nudging strategies in B2C e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning (pp. 21-25). https://doi.org/10.1145/3514262.3514268

  19. Lestari, D., Zainurossalamia ZA, S., Maria, S., Wardhani, W., & Yudaruddin, R. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on performance of small enterprises that are e-commerce adopters and non-adopters. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.38

  20. Lu, S., Yang, L., Liu, W., & Jia, L. (2020). User preference for electronic commerce overpackaging solutions: Implications for cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120936, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120936

  21. Lu, S., Yang, L., Liu, W., & Jia, L. (2020). User preference for electronic commerce overpackaging solutions: Implications for cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120936

  22. Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2015). Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005

  23. Martinho, G., Pires, A., Portela, G., & Fonseca, M. (2015). Factors affecting consumers' choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 103, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.012

  24. Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2011). Barriers to the adoption of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(13), 1417–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.005

  25. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015

  26. Prakash, G., & Pathak, P. (2017). Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India: A study on developing nation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.116

  27. Ricky, C., Ardyanti, A. A. A. P., & Govinda, K. (2022). An unexpected surge in e-commerce and accelerated digital transformation: A blessing in disguise from COVID-19. In Indonesia Post-Pandemic Outlook: Rethinking Health and Economics Post-COVID-19. Penerbit BRIN. https://doi.org/10.55981/brin.537.c517

  28. Rita, P., & Ramos, R. F. (2022). Global research trends in consumer behavior and sustainability in e-commerce: A bibliometric analysis of the knowledge structure. Sustainability, 14(15), 9455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159455

  29. Soedibyo, A., & Kusumawati, N. (2023). The effect of overpackaging solutions in e-commerce towards consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Studies and Applied Marketing. https://doi.org/10.58229/jcsam.v1i2.89

  30. Su, Y., Duan, H., Wang, Z., Song, G., Kang, P., & Chen, D. (2020). Characterizing the environmental impact of packaging materials for express delivery via life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122961

  31. Tang, D. (2021). WHAT IS DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION? EDPACS, 64(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2020.1847813

  32. Tencati, A., Pogutz, S., Moda, B., Brambilla, M., & Cacia, C. (2016). Prevention policies addressing packaging and packaging waste: Some emerging trends. Waste Management, 56, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.025

  33. Wang, J., Yan, Y., Du, H., & Zhao, R. (2020). The optimal sales format for green products considering downstream investment. International Journal of Production Research, 58(4), 1107–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1612963

  34. Wasesa, M., Hidayat, T., Andariesta, D. T., Natha M. G., Attazahri A. K., Afrianto, M. A., Mubarok, M. Z., Zulhan, Z., & Putro, U. S.  (2022) Economic and Environmental Assessments of an Integrated Lithium-Ion Battery Waste Recycling Supply Chain: A Hybrid Simulation Approach. J Clean Prod 379:134625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134625

  35. Watkins, E., Schweitzer, J.-P., Leinala, E., & Börkey, P. (2019). POLICY APPROACHES TO INCENTIVISE SUSTAINABLE PLASTIC DESIGN. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/233ac351-en

  36. Wozniak, T., Stieger, M., Schaffner, D., Schu, M., & Lu, G. (2022). Algorithmic nudging for sustainability in e-commerce: Conceptual framework and research agenda. In Proceedings of the 35th Bled eConference Digital Restructuring and Human (Re)action. https://doi.org/10.18690/um.fov.4.2022.43

  37. Xie, G., Huang, L., Apostolidis, C., Huang, Z., Cai, W., & Li, G. (2021). Assessing Consumer Preference for Overpackaging Solutions in E-Commerce. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 7951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157951

  38. Yuniar, R. W. (2020, July 4). Larangan plastik di tengah PSBB Jakarta: “butuh terobosan baru” atur penggunaan plastik di belanja online. BBC News Indonesia.

  39. Zhang, G., & Zhao, Z. (2012). Green Packaging Management of Logistics Enterprises. Physics Procedia, 24, 900–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.135

  40. Zhang, M., Chen, Y., & Shen, Y. (2016). China’s Environmental Threats of Internet Shopping Packaging Wastes. Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0525.1000401

  41. Zimmermann, T., & Bliklen, R. (2020). Single-use vs. reusable packaging in e-commerce: comparing carbon footprints and identifying break-even points. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 29(3), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.3.8

bottom of page