Comparison of Chinese and Indonesian Legal Cultures in Contract Making
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Law and Humanities
Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2827-9735

Judge Gavel
 Scales of Justice
City Crowds
People in Library
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 08 August 2023

Comparison of Chinese and Indonesian Legal Cultures in Contract Making

Diana Febrina Lubis, Agus Yudha Hernoko, Hasim Purba, Dedi Harianto

Universitas Sumatera Utara, Universitas Airlangga

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1996.02.03.67

Pages: 8-18

Keywords: Legal Culture, Contract, Chinese, Indonesian

Abstract

This article discusses the comparison of legal culture between the Chinese and Indonesian people in making contracts. A comparison of legal culture is carried out by comparing the legal culture of the Chinese and Indonesian people in complying with contract law based on the Chinese/Chinese Civil Code and Indonesian Civil Code as well as other related regulations in the field of contracting. Contract law in China is known as the Contract Law of the People's Republic of China, the people are called Chinese. However, on January 1, 2021, the Contract Law in China has been declared revoked and is no longer valid because a new law known as the Chinese Civil Code has been promulgated. Meanwhile, contract law in Indonesia is also known as the Civil Code, which was obtained from the colonial era government, and is still in force today. Meanwhile, in the Netherlands, only the Civil Code used previously has been updated. The problem raised is how to compare the legal culture of the Chinese and Indonesian people in making contracts. The method used is normative legal research with a comparative approach. The analytical knife used is the general theory of contract law in positive law. Through the analysis carried out, the comparison factors were obtained as the basis for the comparison of making contracts by the Chinese and Indonesian people. From the results of this comparison, the differences and similarities of contract law that apply in Indonesia and China are obtained.

References

Adolf, H., (2010), “Penyelesaian Sengketa di Bidang Ekonomi dan Keuangan” [“Dispute Resolution in the Economic and Financial Sector”], Indonesia Arbitrataion, Quarterly Nesletter No. 9.
Badrulzaman, MD, 1993, KUHPerdata Buku III Hukum Perikatan Dengan Penjelasannya [Civil Code Book III of the Law of Engagement with its Explanation], Bandung: Alumni.
Badrulzaman, MD, et al., 2001, Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan [Compilation of Engagement Law], Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Berkowitz, R., 2009, The Gift of Science: Leibniz and the Modern Legal Tradition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2009.
China Justice Observer (CJO), “Apa Hukum Utama di Tiongkok? – Hukum China Dalam Satu Menit” [“What is the Main Law in China? – Chinese Law In One Minute”], https://id.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/what-are-the-main-laws-in-china., accessed Monday, May 30th 2022.
China Justice Observer (CJO), “KUH Perdata Tiongkok: Kontrak Buku III (2020)” [“China Civil Code: Contract Book III (2020)”], https://id.chinajusticeobserver.com/law/x/civil-code-of-china-part-iii-contract-20200528/intro., accessed Monday, May 30th, 2022.
China Justice Observer (CJO), “Seri Kode Sipil RRT – 03: Hal tentang Kontrak” [“China's Civil Code Series – 03: Matters of Contracts”], https://id.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/prc-civil-code-series-03-the-thing-about-contracts., accessed Monday, May 30th, 2022.
China Justice Observer (CJO), “Seri KUH Perdata RRC - 01: Hal Tentang Bagian I Prinsip Umum” [“PRC Civil Code Series - 01: Matters Regarding Part I General Principles”], https://en.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/pr-%20civil-code-series-01-the-thing-about-part-i-general-principles., accessed Monday, May 30th, 2022.
Contract Law of the People's Republic of China.
Fuady, M., 1999, Hukum Kontrak: Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Bisnis [Contract Law: From a Business Law Perspective], Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hutabarat, SMP, 2010, Penawaran dan Penerimaan Dalam Hukum Perjanjian [Offer and Acceptance in Covenant Law], Jakarta: Grasindo.
Indahwati, MDA, 2020, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Akibat Cacat Tersembunyi Pada Barang Objek Jual Beli Internasional” ["Legal Protection for Buyers Due to Hidden Defects in International Sale and Purchase Objects”], Thesis, Faculty of Law Airlangga University, Surabaya.
Julisman, 2017, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Akibat Cacat Tersembunyi Pada Barang Objek Jual Beli Internasional” [“Legal Analysis of the Position of Using Checks and Bilyet Giro as Debt Collateral in Business Relations”], Thesis, Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata [Code of Civil law].
Kode Sipil Republik Rakyat China, Buku ke-III: Kontrak, Bagian Kesatu Ketentuan Umum. [Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, Book III: Contracts, Part One General Provisions].
Kusmiati, NI, (2017), “Kedudukan Unidroit Sebagai Sumber Hukum Kontrak Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Kontrak Indonesia Yang Akan Datang” [“Unidroit's Position as a Source of Contract Law in the Future Updates of Indonesian Contract Law”], Journal of Litigation Vol. 18.(1).
Lubis, TM, (2021), “Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Perjanjian Bilateral Terkait Pinjaman Kepada China Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional [Bilateral Agreement Legal Cancellation Due Loans Related to China in The International Legal Perspective]”, Res Nullius Law Journal Vol. 3.(1), January, p. 79-88.
Maharani, Aisyah., (2020), “Ironi Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia” [“The Irony of the Civil Code in the Indonesian Legal System”], Journal of RechtsVinding ISSN 2089-9009.
Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek 1992.
Saliman, AR, et al., 2004, Esensi Hukum Bisnis Indonesia, Teori dan Contoh Kasus [Essence of Indonesian Business Law, Theory and Case Examples], Jakarta: Prenada.
Satrio, J., 1993, Hukum Perikatan Pada Umumnya [General Engagement Law], Bandung: Alumni.
Soenardi, T., 2004, Prinsip-prinsip Unidroit [Unidroit Principles], Jakarta: Thomson Gale.
Subekti, R., 1992, Kumpulan Karangan Hukum Perikatan, Arbitrase dan Peradilan [Collection of Legal Commitments, Arbitration and Judiciary], Bandung: Alumni.
Sugiastuti, NY, (2015), “Esensi Kontrak Sebagia Hukum vs. Budaya Masyarakat Idnonesia Yang Non-Law Minded dan Berbasis Oral Tradition” [“The Essence of Contracts as Legal vs. Non-Law Minded and Oral Tradition-Based Indonesian Culture”], PRIORIS Legal Journal Vol. 5.(1), p. 31-44.
Susanti, Fitri., 2008, “Praktek Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Hak Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Akta Notaris di Jakarta Timur” [“Practice of Binding Agreement on Sale and Purchase of Land Rights Based on Notary Deed in East Jakarta”], Thesis, Notary Masters Study Program, Faculty of Law Diponegoro University, Semarang.
Susanto, NA, (2014), “Dimensi Aksiologis Dari Putusan Kasus “ST” (Kajian Putusan Peninjauan Kembali No. 97PK/Pid.Sus/2012)” [“The Axiological Dimensions of the "ST" Case Judgment (Review of Judicial Decision No. 97PK/Pid.Sus/2012)”], Judicial Journal Vol. 7.3, December, p. 213-235.
Trebilcock, MJ, 1997, The Limits of Freedom of Contract, USA: Harvard University Press.
Wardiono, L., (2012), “Sistem Hukum China: Sebuah Tatanan Yang Terkonstruksi Dalam Lintasan Li dan Fa” [“Chinese Legal System: An Order Constructed in Li and Fa Paths”], Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 15.(1), March, p. 71-84.
Wasitaatmadja, FF, 2020, Etnografi Hukum: Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Cina Jelata [Legal Ethnography: Legal Culture of Common Chinese Society], 1st Edition, 1st Printed, Jakarta: Kenccana.

bottom of page