Constitutionality of Provisions Related to Suit Against an Indigent Person in India: Legal Discourse
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Law and Humanities
Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2827-9735

Judge Gavel
 Scales of Justice
City Crowds
People in Library
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 07 November 2022

Constitutionality of Provisions Related to Suit Against an Indigent Person in India: Legal Discourse

Vaibhav Kartikeya Agrawal

Hidayatullah National Law University

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1996.01.04.36

Pages: 76-84

Keywords: Indigent person, Court-Fee, Code of Civil Procedure, Welfare State, Special Rules

Abstract

The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) is the parent law that provides for matters related to procedure for filing of suit in civil cases, i.e. filing of plaint, written statement, the contents of pleadings, the submission of evidence, etc. This paper endeavors to contemplate rule 11 of Order XXXIII of CPC which authorizes revocation of the permission granted to sue as an indigent plaintiff due to non-delivery of summons or non-appearance of the plaintiff when the suit is called on for hearing. It further endeavors to analyze rule 11-A of Order XXXIII of CPC which mandates the Court to order for recovery of Court fees and other litigation expenses from the estate of the deceased plaintiff. The paper concludes that such a review of the provisions related to suit by an indigent person would make the procedure in consonance with the principles of equity and the legal jurisprudence. The paper uses doctrinal method.

References

Friedmann, W., (5th edn. 1967) Legal Theory 21 (London, Stevens and Sons).
Langan, P. St. J., (12th edn. 1969) Maxwell On The Interpretation Of Statutes 105-106 (Sweet and Maxwell Limited).
Paton, G.W., (3rd ed. 1964) A Text-Book Of Jurisprudence 4 (English Language Book Society and Oxford University Press).
Dicey, (1st edn. 1968) An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution xxxv (English Language Book Society and Macmillan and Co Ltd).
Jain, M.P., (6th edn. 2006, reprint 2009) M.P. Jain Outlines Of Indian Legal And Constitutional History 501 (Lexis Nexis Butter worths Wadhwa Nagpur).
Paranjape, Dr. N.V., (6th ed. 2011) Studies in Legal Theory and Jurisprudence 403 (Central Law Agency, Allahabad, reprint 2012).
Takwani, Justice C. K., (7th edn. 2013 reprinted 2015) Civil Procedure with Limitation Act 1963, 1 (Eastern Book Company, Lucknow).
Corwin, Edward S., (First Indian Edition 1966) The Constitution And What It Means Today (Sterling Publishers (P) Ltd. Jullundhur, Delhi).
Asirvatham, Dr. Eddy, and Misra, K. K., (13th edn. 2011, reprint 2012) Political Theory (S. Chand and Company Ltd. New Delhi).
Gauba, O.P., (5th edn. reprint 2012) An Introduction to Political Theory, 27 (Macmillan Publishers India Ltd.).
Basu, Dr. Durga Das, (20th edn. reprint 2012) Introduction to the Constitution of India (Lexis Nexis Butter worths Wadhwa Nagpur).
Agrawal, Dr. H. O., (15th edn. 2014) Human Rights (Central Law Publications, Allahabad).
1 USD to INR from 1947 to 2020, Retrieved 26.10.2022 from: https://blog.thomascook.in/1-usd-to-inr-from-1947-to-2020/.
Reserve Bank of India, Retrieved 26.10.2022 from: https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/ReferenceRateArchive.aspx.
1 USD to INR - Convert US Dollars to Indian Rupees Xe Currency Converter, Retrieved 26.10.2022 from: https://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=1&From=USD&To=INR.
Gill v. Donald Humberstone and Co. Ltd., [1963] 1 W.L.R. 929, at p. 934; Retrieved 01.11.2022, from: https://swarb.co.uk/gill-v-donald-humberstone-and-co-ltd-hl-1963/.
Indian Institute of Legal Education, Golden Rule of interpretation, Retrieved 31.10.2022, from: https://www.iilsindia.com/blogs/golden-rule-of-interpretation/.
Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer Committee Report on Processual Justice to the People, dated May 1973, page 8, Retrieved 12.03.2017, from: http://reports.mca.gov.in/Reports/15-Iyer%20committee%20report%20of%20the%20expert%20committee%20in%20legal%20aid,%201973.pdf

bottom of page