Neoliberal Economy and Inequalization: The Experience of Underprivileged Global Regions during 1985-2008
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 09 February 2024

Neoliberal Economy and Inequalization: The Experience of Underprivileged Global Regions during 1985-2008

Khaybar Ali Miah

Berhampore Girls’ College Under University of Kalyani West Bengal, India

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.07.01.466

Pages: 59-72

Keywords: Alternative Paradigm, Inequality, Post-Neoliberalism, Social Insecurity, Social Solidarity, Unleashed Capital

Abstract

The perspective of plausible new paradigm of inflated unequal economic growth during the era of globalization produced a mounting paradoxical order of persistent inequality in a new form. The paradigm of massive historical process spurred by the Neo-liberal doctrine deteriorated the developing regions with sheer experience of the concentration of poverty and social insecurity. The most tragic aspect is that it eroded the hope of success of the poor regions by creating their dependency institutionalized with the institutionalization of ever-growing gap between countries and within countries. However, the usual consequence of the crises of neoliberal financial market capitalism led to a new political dimension of ‘Post-neoliberalism’. Focusing briefly on these key-issues, the present article attempts to explore the consequential effect of the unleashed capital over the developing and underprivileged global regions. Finally, the article concludes with the need for the accomplishment of the solidarity of common development towards the space of social security and a real democratic global environment. Hence, the approach towards social solidarity would invariably be an alternative paradigm of today’s global society.

References

  1. Abdalla, Ismail Sabri (1980). The Inadequacy and loss of Legitimacy of the International Monetary Fund. Development Dialogue, 1980:2.

  2. Altvater, Elmer (2009).Postneoliberalism or Postcapitalism? The failure of Neoliberalism in the Financial Market Crisis.  Development Dialogue, 51.

  3. Bellamy, Richard (2003). Liberalism. In Eatwell, Roger & Wright, Anthony (Eds.): Contemporary Political Ideologies. Rawat Publications.

  4. Birdsall, Nancy & Sabot, Richard (2007). Inequality as a Constraint on Growth in Latin America. In SeIigson, Mitchell A. & T Passe-Smith, John (Eds.), Development and Underdevelopment – The Political Economy of Global Inequality. Viva Books Private Limited.

  5. Brie, Michael (2009).Ways out of the Crisis of Neoliberalism. Development Dialogue, 51.

  6. Byres, Terence J. (1997). Introduction: Development planning and the Interventionist State Versus Liberalization and the Neo-Liberal State: India, 1989 – 1996.In Byres, Terence J. (Ed.), The State, Development Planning and Liberalization in India.Oxford University Press.

  7. Camilleri, Joseph A. (2000). Preface. In Camilleri, Joseph A.; Malhotra, Kamal & Tehranian, Majid. Reimagining the Future Towards Democratic Governance – A Report of the Global Governance Reform Project, Australia: The Department of Politics, La Trobe University.

  8. Carmen, Raff (1996). Autonomous Development – Humanizing the Landscape: An Excursion into Radical Thinking and Practice. Vistaar Publications.

  9. Chambers, Robert (1983). Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Longman Group Limited.

  10. Dahrendorf, Ralf (1995). Economic Opportunity, Civil Society and Political Liberty. Discussion Paper, 58, March, Geneva: UNRISD.

  11. Deacon, Bob (2000). Social Policy in a Global Context. In Hurrell, Andrew & Woods, Ngaire (Eds.), Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. Oxford University Press.

  12. Deaton, Angus & Dreze Jean (2003). Poverty and Inequality in India – A Re-Examination. Economic and Political Weekly, XXXVII, 26, September 7 – 13.

  13. Desai, Nitin (1997). Globalization, Solidarity and Public Policy. In Advancing the Social Agenda: Two Years after Copenhagen – Report of the UNRISD International Conference and Public Meeting, Geneva, 9 – 10 July, 1997. UNRISD.

  14. DFID (2001). Eliminating Global Poverty: The Middle Income Countries. DFID.

  15. Dreze, Jean & Sen, Amartya (1998). Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Oxford University Press.

  16. Dreze, Jean & Sen, Amartya (2002). India- Development and Participation. Oxford University Press.

  17. Ehrlich, Paul R. (1975). The Population Bomb.River City Press.

  18. Emmerij, Louis; Jolly, Richard & Weiss, Thomas G. (2001). Ahead of the Curve? UN Ideas and Global Challenges. Indiana University Press.

  19. Eswaran, Mukesh (2006). Fertility in Developing Countries. In Banerjee, Abhijit Binayak, Benabou, Roland & Mookherjee, Dilip (Eds.), Understanding Poverty. Oxford University Press.

  20. Francis, David J (1999). Mercenary Intervention in Sierra Leone: Providing National Security or International Exploitation?. Third World Quarterly, 20, Number 2.

  21. Haan, Arjan de (1999). Social Exclusion: Towards an Holistic Understanding of Deprivation. Dissemination Note 2, April. London: DFID.

  22. Hellinger, Douglas (1995). Adjustment, Globalization and Social Development (Report of the UNRISD/UNDP International Seminar on Economic Restructuring and Social Policy). 11-13 January. UNRISD.

  23. Hettne, Bjorn (1997). Development, Security and World Order: A Regionalist Approach. The European Journal of Development Research, 9, No.1, June.

  24. Hiemenz, Ulrich (1993). Liberalization Versus Structural Policy. Development and Cooperation, 1.

  25. IMF Fiscal Affairs Department (2007). Should Equity Be a Goal of Economic Policy? In SeIigson, Mitchell A. & T Passe-Smith, John (Eds.): op. cit.

  26. Killick, Tony & Malik, M. (1991). Country Experiences with IMF Programmes in the 1980s. ODI Working Paper 48, London.

  27. Lemaresquier, Thierry & Grinspun, Alejandro (1999). What is the World Wanting For?. Choices (The Human Development Magazine). UNDP, August, 1999.

  28. Morales, Isidro (1994). Poverty in Latin America – A Survey of Major Topics in the Analysis of Poverty and in Current Poverty Alleviation Policies. CDR, Working Paper, 94. 7 June.

  29. Radhakrishna, R. & Rao, K. Hamumantha (2006). Poverty, Unemployment, and Public Intervention. In India-Social Development Report, Council for Social Development. Oxford University Press.

  30. Rahnema, Majid (2000). Poverty. In Sachs, Wolfgang (Ed.), The Development Dictionary – A Guide to Knowledge as Power. Orient Longman Limited.

  31. Sader, Emir (2009). Postneoliberalism in Latin America. Development Dialogue, 51, January.

  32. Sen, Amartya (2006). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.

  33. Standing, Guy (1997). The Challenge of Learning from Experience. In Advancing the Social Agenda: Two Years after Copenhagen: op. cit.

  34. Stewart, Frances & Berry, Albert (2000). Globalization Liberalization, and Inequality: Expectations and Experience. In Hurrell, Andrew and Woods, Ngaire (eds.): op.cit.

  35. Stiglitz, Joseph (2006). Making Globalization Work – The Next Steps to Global Justice. Allen Lane.

  36. Swamy, Dilip S. (1997). The World Bank and the Globalization of the Indian Economy. In George, K.K.; Nair, V. Sankaran & Jacob, Jose (Eds.), Economic Development and the Quest for Alternatives. Concept Publishing Company.

  37. Thomas, Caroline (2005). Poverty, Development and Hunger. In Baylis, John & Smith, Steve (Eds.), The Globalization of World Politics- An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press.

  38. Trainer, F.E. (1997). Why Development is Impossible. Scandinavian Journal of Development Alternatives and Area Studies,16, 3 & 4, September & December.

  39. UNDP (1997). Human Development Report – 1997. Oxford University Press.

  40. UNDP (1998). UNDP Today – Fighting Poverty– 1998. Fact Sheet, New York.

  41. UNDP (2003). Human Development Report – 2003.Oxford University Press.

  42. UNDP (2005). Human Development Report – 2005.  Oxford University Press.

  43. UNDP (2009). Human Development Report – 2009. Palgrave Macmillan.

  44. Woods, Ngaire (2005). International Political Economy in an age of Globalization. In Baylis, John and Smith, Steve (eds.): op. cit.

  45. World Bank (2006). World Development Report – 2006. Oxford University Press.

  46. World Bank (2008). World Development Report – 2008. The World Bank, Washington DC.

  47. World Bank Development Policy Review (2004).India – Sustaining Reform, Reducing Poverty. Oxford University Press.

bottom of page